Plast Reconstr Surg 1997 Dec;100(7):1723-6; discussion 1727-8

(ISSN: 0032-1052)

Beekman WH; Feitz R; Hage JJ; Mulder JW

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University

Hospital Vrije Universiteit,

Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

The discussion on possible side effects of implanted silicone has resulted in a growing number of patients inquiring whether or not their mammary prostheses are intact and when failure of the prostheses is to be expected. Between November 1988 and May 1995, 182 patients had their silicone mammary prostheses replaced, repositioned, or removed one to three times. Capsular contraction, dislocation, pain paresthesia, and/or suspected rupture were common indications for surgery. To try and be able to provide an indication as to the correlation of implant age and integrity, we recorded the status of all 426 prostheses observed during secondary surgery. In this selected group of patients, approximately 50 percent of the mammary prostheses with an implant age of 7 to 10 years showed gel bleed or rupture. Applying the survival Kaplan-Meier curve, 50 percent of implants may be expected to bleed or be ruptured at the age of 15 years. Rupture was observed more frequently than gel bleed. It seems that there is no chronologic relation between gel bleed and rupture.